‘Serial’ case: Judge orders new look at Syed case

by -19 Views

BALTIMORE —
A Baltimore choose has ordered new testing for proof within the case of a Maryland man whose homicide conviction was chronicled within the podcast “Serial.”

Baltimore Circuit Courtroom Decide Melissa Phinn signed an order Monday mandating that Baltimore police ship proof within the case towards Adnan Syed inside 15 days to a California crime lab, information shops reported.

Final week, prosecutors and Syed’s defence each signed a movement in search of a retest of some gadgets collected as proof within the 1999 killing of 17-year-old Hae Min Lee utilizing DNA know-how that was not obtainable for Syed’s trials.

Syed is serving a life sentence after he was convicted in 2000 of strangling Lee and burying her physique in a Baltimore park. Syed and Lee have been highschool classmates who had dated.

In its debut 2014 season, the “Serial” podcast shined a highlight on the case that led to renewed courtroom proceedings.

Authorities have maintained Lee struggled in a automotive with Syed earlier than her demise. Within the newest movement, Syed’s legal professional argued that in such circumstances, a killer must be in shut proximity to the sufferer. The movement requested testing the proof for the presence of DNA.

Syed’s defence approached the state’s legal professional’s workplace’s sentencing evaluation unit about Syed’s case, the state’s legal professional’s workplace stated in a press release. Because the case was reviewed for a doable resentencing, it turned clear that it might be acceptable to pursue further forensic testing, which wasn’t obtainable through the authentic investigation or trial, prosecutors stated. The Juvenile Restoration Act, which handed final yr, permits these convicted as juveniles to request a sentence modification after serving not less than 20 years in jail.

See also  Abramovich: Jet linked to oligarch lands in Moscow - BBC.com

The Workplace of the Legal professional Normal oversaw the DNA evaluation of proof in Syed’s case in 2018 and not one of the samples examined constructive of Syed. His defence argued that was proof he did not kill Lee, however prosecutors disagreed. Objects being examined below this order weren’t examined through the legal professional normal’s evaluation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

No More Posts Available.

No more pages to load.